HELP, FAGGOTS ARE MASS VOTING ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
Oh yeah that's super important and binding
so nigger you'll let the faggots show how many of them and make the congress consider to legalize same-sex marriage?
Not even him but I could not give less of a fuck about this. 2016+ made faggots OD on salt to the point where they try to generate it constantly.
>legalize same-sex marriage?
They're fags. They're not part of the "birthrates" equation & never will be. Only christcucks really give a shit about this.
wait didnt that already happen
Shouldn't they be married first? I thought sex outside of marriage was bad.
>They're not part of the "birthrates" equation
Bullshit. Gay parenting is on the rise.
>on the rise
For wealthy faggots who can afford invitro & medical expenses for a surrogate, so there's a ceiling there. Never going to have any significant impact one way or another on the rates themselves.
>They're not part of the "birthrates" equation & never will be
no, Philippines is a strict country and showing kids that faggot-sex is not bad would ruin the entire country and made the principles and discipline of the ancestors nonsense.
It's sodomy, not sex.
It's someone's dick going in someone else's hole.
Unless you'd turn down blowjobs from any chick on principle you're a hypocrite, really.
I dislike fags in general & hate the ones who insist on the kind of dildosuit pride parade fucking visibility anywhere, but come on.
>Philippines is a strict country
Islandnigger your AOC is 12.
I don't see why you would give a shit about the birthrates if you're fully on board with your institutions being hijacked by your enemies. Faggots don't want fag marriage because they give a shit about marriage or what it represents, or even the small legal perks that come with it -, they just feel like their sexuality is being socially devalued if they're denied the prestige of the institution.
Jesus, just look at the wording of those poll options.
>Yes, because this will give equal civil rights to same-sex couples. The bill provides such couples with legal partnership status that will govern their property rights, custodial rights over children and adoption rights.
>No, because the underlying intention is to legalize marriage between members of the same sex and I personally believe this is wrong.
What option do you think the virtue-signalling pollster wants you to choose?
Pretty broadly sweeping generalization there. There's a lot of otherwise conservative fags. Plus, I made the error of assuming this was some US state issue being discussed at first, between the .gov address & mentions of house & senate; so the birthrate issue is moot.
A blowjob isn't sex either. I don't consider any encounter that doesn't involve copulation between the sexual organs of either party to be sex.
They wouldn't be conservative if they thought sodomy had any place being enshrined in marriage. This is coming from one of those "conservative fags".
Conservatism & religion CAN be mutually exclusive. This doesn't disprove my original point that only christcucks really give a shit about the "marriage" part of it specifically.
And I'd love a personal perspective on why anyone who buys into God sending you all to hell for where he gave you inclinations to stick your dick would be worshippers. Seems dissonant.
I am homosexual. I am a man who is exclusively attracted to other men. This is PURELY a description of a very small part of myself, and it has absolutely no bearing on how I choose to live my life or what I believe. I don't on anyone who suggests it needs to.
'Muh dick' is not the center of my identity and my moral core need 'not bend to it before reason. Stop thinking like a goddamn slave.
*I spit on anyone who suggests it needs to
Kill yourself faggot.
oh no i hope faggots are not allowed to get married let's get all mad and do something
>let's pretend it's 5 or 10 years ago
>Stop thinking like a goddamn slave
There's still seeming dissonance here.
You're talking about upholding the sanctity of marriage as a religious institution while simultaneously saying you have the ability to personally reinterpret the base religion it's an institution of. So I don't see how it being reinterpreted legislatively is some huge stretch beyond that.
come , shitpost at >>>/pol02/
Homos who say they won't push their pozz loads on everyone else are like the niggers of yesteryear who said that segregation wasn't needed, and just like how the worst parts of negro culture are now completely proliferated throughout our entire society, so would the gay community's ""culture""
Most fags are totally indoctrinated into the blatant ashken visible faggotry shit. But there's about the same percentage of gays not about or into that as there are based black men. Very small but still there.
I personally agree with using stereotypes to assume until it's proven individually they're untrue for that particular one, but not beyond that. Before long whites are going to be at the point where the native americans have been for a long time; where shared culture & ideology trumps race because it'd die out entirely otherwise.
>he thinks Christianity is the only religion to recognize homosexuality as an invalid and aberrant expression of sexuality which has no functional purpose in the formation or continuation of families, which marriage is essential to
What am I reinterpreteing btw? Also, I'm not even necessarily holding up the "sanctity of marriage" expressly as a religious institution, so much as I'm interested in persevering it as an institution that MEANS anything at all.
Our society is nearing total and ultimate collapse and once it does, oh lord it will be an absolute bloodbath. I can't wait.
>What am I reinterpreteing btw?
I can only make assumptions from the vague way you hint at shit. You started talking about the sanctity of it being threatened by sodomy while also saying you were a gay conservative. 9 out of 10 are going to assume you're of some abrahamic faith (take your pick, they're all the same god by different names). All of which hold fags going into the flames as a base principle.
So please do go into more detail about how this is not untrue.
>I'm interested in persevering it as an institution that MEANS anything at all
You're easily 60-100 years too late on that one.
>fags going into the flames as a base principle
You don't know what you're talking about and I don't think it's worth my time to explain why that is the case. You should have a basic understanding of the thing you're talking about before opening your mouth about it. This isn't me being vague or evasive either, it's just laziness.
I am gay. That is a description of how my sexuality happens to orient itself and only that. It has no bearing on how I live my life, and if you're not getting what I mean by that, it means I don't sleep with or seek sexual/romantic partnership from other men. I am basically a fucking monk at this point.
The reason this is so perplexing to you is because you can't imagine putting yourself in the shoes of someone who has a desire yet isn't enslaved to the base pursuit of it. We all have vices and I am no different, but they are not my master. It's that simple, however difficult.
>100 years too late on that one
Then I am interested in restoring it. I am a reactionary.
>The reason this is so perplexing to you is because you can't imagine putting yourself in the shoes of someone who has a desire yet isn't enslaved to the base pursuit of it
Nigger you're talking to a fucking hebephile.
I hate "gay" culture, dude. It's probably the main reason I am the way I am. Irrespective of any moral or religious beliefs I have, I've always felt extremely disgusted towards this shit, and that prejudice alone would probably be more than enough to set me in opposition to it.
qid=60="Yes, because this will give equal civil rights to same-sex couples. The bill provides such couples with legal partnership status that will govern their property rights, custodial rights over children and adoption rights."
qid=61="No, because the underlying intention is to legalize marriage between members of the same sex and I personally believe this is wrong."
qid=62="I am undecided."
while true; do curl -A "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0" -e "http://www.congress.gov.ph/" -F"pollid=21" -F"qid=61" -F"vote=Vote" "http://www.congress.gov.ph/"; done
untested, don't know if this actually works/is IP limited, but if not, and it's only cookie-based, here you go
homosexuals will forever wander the earth you dumbass.
your kid will come out gay and the rest of your generation will too
Faggots won't marry,thet just do disgusting hookups on grindr and catch aids.
They don't stop doing hookups just because they're married either. Monogamous gay relationships, excluding lesbians, simply do not exist.
So what's the point of marriage then,I hate faggots they are worse than women.
t. bitter faggot who can't land a good bf
oh god I'm projecting again
I never had a bf because of this fact i'll stay closeted forever.
same, i hope that once i get a job things will change
what will exactly change?you will never find a good non whore who doesn't have aids date in the gay community
i'll date a robot, problem solved and i get a cute autist to spoil
I want to hide my faggotry
I need to get an income before I can consider dating
it was worth a try,have a good day anon
you too, I hope you find a cute hubby to cuddle
>ITT: faggots who are so totally closeted they can't even admit it on an anonymous micronesian used diaper microwaving enthusiast forum without spoilering half the fucking thread
I'd rather the people interested in this topic didn't have to read through my gay shit.
Considerate yet a bit worse than unnecessary as they'll read it anyway because it being spoilered forces them to just to see wtf you're spoilering.
Nobody really gives much of a fuck about your gayness.