New meme thread because the old one is autosaging, starting with a request: I need the exploitable 8ch logo, have this crop in return
Our rival highschool was named after Newman
>Implying the nerds at /christian/ don't know the difference
This is why I love the internet
1.)Oral tradition has the content as the written tradition, the difference it the deliverance methodology.
2.)It doesn't need to because sola scriptura is about what are sole measurement of doctrines for the church, and the papists church played a minimal role in the biblical canon. Heck, even Luther opponents didn't believed the apocryphal book were canonized.
3.) Now this is just disingenuous. The Vatican only, officially interpreted less than 20 verses! (not to mention that many are paradoxical in context) and as long as they doesn't counteracts said verses, apologists/priests can use their own interpretation for the rest of the bible. But when protestants can demonstrate the ancient meaning that a big no no!
Oh, and let's not forget that everyone post-Origen accepted the Alexandrian method of interpretation, which proves that there was not secret spoken tradition pass through only the most loyal bishop-just baloney. Even if there was such a thing, the closest that could've existed by Papias was universally rejected as an apostolic beacon of tradition for the church
Sal doesn’t have an actual way to make good Christian memes, so he uses 8chan’s comments, which makes him tonight’s biggest loser
kek, is that OC?
When you realize that the more memes you post on this thread, the more old ones get deleted
But then you realize that the old memes getting deleted means that newer and better ones can be made
They'll get reposted eventually.
First of all, its not heresy if it's personal opinion and hope rather than a thing you want to autistically force upon others (because they have completely different connotations and implications) and most of the forms of apocatastasis that were condemned were specific forms such as Origenism not because of apokatastasis as it is, but the means and reasons behind it, such as either transmigrations of souls and bizarre teachings about resurrection (ex: Origenists thought, how I remember at least and correct me if I am wrong, that rather than post-resurrection mankind having bodies with spiritual-like qualities, it would actually be literally spiritual...plus spherical with all things).
Or are you one of those people who mistake apokatastasis with the fact that Orthodox dont think about heaven as a golden tesseract city or hell as a prison with lava? Because in most cases it is so from my experience and I still dont get why do people mix up the two, while they arent related in the first place.
That's fantastic, you win
We live in, dare I say it, a society
When you look at the total number of people on r/Christianity vs the number of people on here
No I don't want shills here
I wish these normalfag memes would get deleted
So I take it that you’re a dc fan?
>liking any capeshit
Back to reddit with you.
Song is by Adrian von Ziegler.
So yes, you are a dc fan
>talking about reddit
>wanting to be more like reddit
>posting shitty memes
this one made me kek. we need more of this, Atheism is such a MEME. "I love winnie the pooh science! If it wasn't for science we would have been 1000 years more advanced... because Family Guy said so"
The demon wojak collection
What's redhat got to do with demons though
It's a fedora. If you don't get that reference than you just outted yourself as a newfriend.
It's redhat though not fedora. I would know I run it. The fedora meme is a cropped real black fedora
redhat is a company, that is the company's logo
It's literally a fedora though.
I also think you meant no disrespect. Sometimes we get too enthusiastic when it comes to memes. However I also go tthe feeling it is blasphemous. Not by intent, no doubt. But if I were you I would go confess that. Like...when we stand before God...I would not like to explain "hey...it was just a meme though" or would you? I understand that in this age everything is a meme material since no values are considered absolute by majority of people and the world turns into madness and we already see the abyss. We should however not make such memes about our Savior.
>If Gondola is an artistic expression of humanity, albeit a quirky cartoon one, should we exclude Christ from it?
In me...the Gondola always evokes ridicule, laughter, etc. It is a joke...I would not associate Christ with that.
Kek. I played that game. Good meme.
that being said the crusader gondola was great.
Ye's nondenom tho.
>what do the people who ruined linux have to do with demons
You people are thinking too hard about this. It's a fedora. Coincidentally the fedora used was red. It could have been rainbow colored and it would still be a fedora.
Besides, red looks better as it has a "diabolical" connotation to it, as the devil and demons popularly are known to have red skin.
I'm just saying, any good /tech/nician would wholeheartedly approve of RedHat being used to represent pure evil.
Redhat barely hits the scale when it comes to evil in tech. You're arguing for the sake of it.
do lutherans actually say this? it`s pretty confusing
Not because he believed so, I think it was early 16th century bait-posting. But Luther was crass anyway, always keen to emphasize the scatological nature of the German swear words. I won't repeat the things Luther is reputed to have said here.
He did, but the common defense is
>it's just a prank bro
Which is not a very good defense when you call the Son of God a sinner
They say the Bible is the word of God because the Bible says it is the word of God, which is an absurd point because there needs to be some sort of endorsement on Gods part to confirm its correct.
If Jesus Christ Himself appeared before you and spoke to you, would you refuse Him and say "I'm sorry but there needs to be some endorsement on God's part to confirm what you're saying is correct"?
Yea if someone comes to me and claims to literally be God, I'm going to ask for a sign, you know the same thing that happened in the Bible.
An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign
Yes it does. In Mark 7 Jesus rebukes the Jews for nit following the Bibke and instead following the tradition of the elders.
The Holy Ghost tells you. How would the catholics then decide which ones should be then if not by the HG? Just guess?
So? What would make the catholic church's interpretation better?
>Yes it does. In Mark 7 Jesus rebukes the Jews for nit following the Bibke and instead following the tradition of the elders.
The Gospel wasn't even written yet, following your logic, we should be holding only the Old Testament as Scripture.
>The Holy Ghost tells you. How would the catholics then decide which ones should be then if not by the HG? Just guess?
The Holy Ghost tells you via the Church, not by your lonesome.
>So? What would make the catholic church's interpretation better?
See 2., the Holy Ghost invested its authority into the Church. The Gospel you know was canonized by the Church you rejected.
>Jesus didn't walk around and heal people, cast out demons
Going to just assume your baiting at this point
That's my point. Paul said that to the Thessalonians because not the whole Bible was written yet, now it is. And Jesus rebuked the Jews gor doing exactly what the catholics now do
>2 & 3
But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
>ye need not that any man teach you
That would include the guys wearing funny hats
Now your going to tell me I need a man to interpret that verse
If you need a sign to know if it's Jesus or not than you're a jew
For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness;
>Now your going to tell me I need a man to interpret that verse
You need an Apostle, just as the Eunuch did. Refute all authority to your risk.
Both the Catholics and the Orthodox have stretched scripture to the breaking point in order to engage in backwards rationalization of many of their unbiblical doctrines. Which puts a bit of a damper on the the "appeal to authority" argument you are trying to make.
>Both the Catholics and the Orthodox have stretched scripture to the breaking point
Complete nonsense. Protestants have no answer for the Apostles being given "all authority to bind and loosen on Heaven and Earth", and even much less explanation for the "Keys" and the "Promise" given to St. Peter alone.
If there was no physical Church, then there is no way to exercise the authority, nor is there any way to know whether or not Hell has conquered any Church.
The keys were given to Peter and it dies with Peter.
There's no evidence Rome is the Church.
>The keys were given to Peter and it dies with Peter.
Prove it. With Scripture. When Judas left the Apostles, he was replaced. If Matthias would not share in the authority, then Scripture would have said so. Christ gives authority, and you say He did not. Christ built a Church, and you say there is no Church.
>There's no evidence Rome is the Church.
There is 2,000 years worth of evidence and St. Peter alone, of all the Apostles, was given this promise.
>Prove it. With Scripture.
>And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
No where does it say the church has Peter's keys.
>If Matthias would not share in the authority, then Scripture would have said so.
Authority is to be given, not ASSUMED.
>There is 2,000 years worth of evidence
We only need once, and please prove it.
You are right. Authority is given, just like how Jesus gave the keys to the House of David to St. Peter. Who gave it to his successors after him, so on and so forth.
And yet again, you fail to provide evidence where Peter gives his keys to ANYONE else.
And he was executed, thus the keys die with him.
It's part of the position, nobody in the Early Church has ever said the Seat of Peter disappeared, in fact, nobody every thought any created Seat was "disappeared".
If they Keys died with Peter, then the Church died with Peter.
Your teaching is an innovation, as always.
I still see no scriptures.
The early Church does not speak for Peter.
Peter speaks for Peter, and Peter himself dies.
>then the Church died with Peter.
Historical truth. Peter gave no else the keys.
SystemD is at least as evil as google though.
>is literally calling Christ a liar
The absolute state of protestantism.
>I still see no scriptures.
You need to provide evidence that the Keys or the Apostleship died with either Peter or the rest. You have no proof, seeing as Matthias replaced Judas, neither do you have any Scripture to show that was given to the World was to die with the World.
You're an enemy of Christ's Church, there is no worse thing I could wish for you.
>Peter speaks for Peter, and Peter himself dies.
Which is nowhere in Scripture, nor taught by anyone, not even thought up by anyone.
>Peter gave no else the keys.
It's not his to give. Funny thought; no Pope can relinquish the Papacy, the Papal Seat was created by Christ Himself, no Pope, nor even the Church can end this appointment.
>no Pope can relinquish the Papacy
and by this, I mean destroy the Papal Seat, if we speak merely giving up the Seat, it must be replaced :)
Where did I call Christ a lie?
>You need to provide evidence that the Keys or the Apostleship died with either Peter or the rest.
You need to give evidences where Peter gives the keys to anyone else, I can provide evidences Peter is dead.
>Which is nowhere in Scripture, nor taught by anyone, not even thought up by anyone.
I haven't seen a single scriptural evidence that shows the Church can speak for the dead.
>It's not his to give.
Jesus gave it to him.
>no Pope can relinquish the Papacy
Who? Did Peter give his keys to any man?
It's not his seat.
The seat belongs to Peter, who is dead and dust.
10 Weep for the dead, for his light hath failed: and weep for the fool, for his understanding faileth.
11 Weep but a little for the dead, for he is at rest.
12 For the wicked life of a wicked fool is worse than death.
Amen, amen, but that is no argument.
Who can argue with a fool? No one has ever thought or even taught that the "Keys" died with Peter, nor that the authority died with the Apostles. Not even the heretics of their day, the gnostics whom St. John had to contend with put this forward.
If this anon's argument was right, then the Church has fallen, and Christ lied. Would God ever build a Church that only lasted a generation? Foolish, truly foolish. Not worth my time, and doubly so when even the Scripture advises me to turn away.
Nope, it makes perfect sense.
Christ said hell would not prevail against the church, as Peter dies, he brings back the keys to heaven, thus preventing it from ever being fallen to hell.
The mortals can squabble among themselves, but the church is finished as soon as Peter got executed and decided to not pass on the keys.
>as Peter dies, he brings back the keys to heaven, thus preventing it from ever being fallen to hell.
Your fan-fiction is sacrilegious.
Amen, amen, but it is scriptural that Peter goes into heaven and heaven is a separate place than hell.
Christ didn't lie.
If the keys to the kingdom departed this world, then the gates to the kingdom will remain forever closed. You're beyond all logic, there is no way to reason with you. You've said this before, and you just repeat yourself over and over and over, I pray one day you'll stop.
Christ didn't say he would open heaven forever. But the death of Peter makes it impossible for hell to prevail against the church.
Here are some fun memes to hopefully get this thread back on track
Those are awful, they make my eyes bleed
You're welcome. Now make better memes for the thread.
When mods see a Protestant express their opinion
If I get banned…
…everything's right with the board
Don't believe anything Catholics say or claim about Martin Luther. It's all bullshit. Even atheists don't misrepresent the Bible as badly as Catholics misrepresent Luther. I don't think the majority of them are dishonest, I think they just hear these things form other Catholics who heard them from other Catholics and so on in a five hundred year long game of telephone and they just run with everything without stopping to consider whether or not what they've been told is actually true.
Makes sense, so he was talking about how the world reproached Christ for drunkenness and adultery, and Luther was just giving a plausible reading of a situation in the Bible
I've never heard of this claim before and I am Catholic.
>the future of Christianity is in Africa
Can someone post the Catholic iceberg chart and describe how accurate it is?
not even christian at this point kek
No, there is another one, more elaborate and references Catholic doctrine.
Actually they have some of his bone fragments in the vatican, they aren't dust yet.
Found it. After four days of searching I finally found it.
>Martin Luther was a papist psyop
>disgusted by sins but still sins
For myself is HIGHLY accurate, 90% for me and I'm in level 3. I share some things with level 4 but the ascension showed in the pic is certainly a virtuous one.
Pic attached is St John of the cross ascent of mount Carmel (a mix of Latin and Spanish, central way is "the narrow way of perfection") A meme of the XVI century
And thanks for your work
Anybody have that post about Jewish corpse radiation (limited range horizontally, but unlimited range vertically)?
This is incredibly accurate.
t. level 4.1
So you're pretty much a Catholic Doomer?
I dont know what lutheran church you're talking about, but I know that in the LCMS the official position is that it is Gods body completely, and also bread completely at the same time
The jump past four is full of frequent habits. My wife was a 5-6 for a while last year but it's difficult to keep up with an infant. I go to confession ~2x a month though
I don't know if the "va merda" part is accurate for Latin but I still rate it 8/10.
corrected the part with "antéchrist", I think you call it antichrist in english
Lefties can't meme, the outcome is sad every time.
Not everything is political m8
I could have understand the one criticizing my meme was catholic because he was mad at me for going after the pope.
But now I understand he is not orthodox (he can be a catholic or a protie) for a different reason, because he is like the pope in my meme : not spiritual and worldly.
What is leftist is wanting the world to be perfect (egalitarianism, utopia) and only thinking about it, what is traditional is putting the spiritual, and sanctification, above all.
Bruh, the office of the pope is the antichrist you speak of
Can't you at least call him Francis?
>buying too much beer lately
>replays old video games from 2000's
>tried seeking knowledge, tried fashion, tried lifting
>Has no problem attracting secular women who hate everything he believes in
That second is a picture of Odin and his ravens isnt it?
Pretty sure it's supposed to be a monk with a long beard. Isn't Odin usually depicted as a warrior with a horned helmet and stuff?
What an evil witch.
Is that true?
Wasn't Ayn Rand that said, "i am against God and religion. I regard it as evil"
winnie the pooh this is me. Less the lifting try and bear part.
I need to know the one who made this, or others like this. My steam is "duguesclin" or "no one"
kek pretty much me as well.
Night walking sounds pleasant, sure I could get some good prayer in whilst doing so.
>tried seeking knowledge
I'm still doing it
All me except beer, music and videogames
Nah, he's an one eyed dude with raven pets. Honestly, the image is so blurry even I confused him with an Orthodox monk.
Why are you guys so opposed to capital control?
What have you done to Doctor Eugene Michael Jones you bunch of /pol/ meanies ?!?
Depends on the capital control used and who is usuing it. For the most part, less capital controls the better.
>t. Economically illiterate leftist
I'm not. I'm a free market libertarian (inb4 that illiterate cuck who doesn't know the difference between libertarian and libertine shows up). Look at the economic model of Leviticus and tell me it's not (mostly) free market. Sure there were taxes, but there were no laws determining who made money. The primary restricting factor was the law against usury, which was good.
Usury was a mistake.
Close but no cigar for me. I love alcohol, have practically stopped playing videogames, and usually I'm one of the last to leave church. The rest is too close for comfort though.
I don't think it's that accurate, I'll praise the using of metaphysics to gauge politics, but I hang out late at church, and I would only listen to music like that if you paid me
tfw you spot a novus ordo
It's been far too long
Merda is legit, Va I've never heard, but could be. Better would be the vocative "O merda" but I suspect that Va is a good bit of vulgar Latin which works with a GTA meme.
Merda means bird shit in classical Latin, it was only later in the imperial period that it became a universal term for excrement. Since religious significance was attached to the flight of birds through the practice of augury, bird shit has the connotations of a bad omen, a shitty situation etc. so saying Merda began to pack more punch than words like stercus (dung), excrementum, or faeces (which just means dregs, not feces per se). So merda is good, recognizable street latin
Really a better version would be, "imus" means "we went"
"Ah Merda, adeo hic iterimus"
iterum is more correct, but iterimus is more vulgar, people used to embellish the ends of words to sound fancier, which slowly destroyed Latin and resulted in romance languages.
SSPX aren't sedes, they are in irregular communion with Rome and as I understand it from an episode of TNT they are trying to actively work towards being in full communion.
Sorry, ignore this, I forgot it's "here we go again" not "here I go again"
I don't like him, even if he's mellowing into "cultural christianity".
How much butthurt would there be if he converted?
Dawkins is a clown, not many even in academia take him seriously. Just his lame fedora audience.
He helped create the vacuum that allowed Muslims to come in and take over. These are the fruits of atheism. He is as guilty as they are. I pray he repents and ends his blasphemy denying God.
The fedora salt from Dawkins converting would be more epic than the liberal salt from the 2016 election.
IIRC he spent a lot of time in the UK shilling for Ielam for whatever reason, so dont think he coming to Christ anytime soon.
>Or is that just my cultural upbringing?
Maybe he's signalling his rejection of the way he was raised so as to better accept Islam?
For I tell you: there shall be much more salt mining if a top fedora converts than if a hundred Trumps were to be elected as POTUS.
Fun thing is, after going on how any sort of religion is worse than 10 Hitlers, and there's no difference between them, he's now a bit desperate.
His secular pals consider him too racist and islamophobic now, and the religious audience isn't suddenly crowning him their greatest ally for admiting the basic fact that there's an actual difference between a random church charity baking charity drive, and Petro-islam radicalized first world immigrant Salafis.
He certainly took his time to see the merits of christian ethic. Silly man, how much damage has he done through the years?
>he's now a bit desperate
I remember that talk on memes he made that ended with a video of noisy, colorful random shit that you can tell he meant to become viral. It didn't. Dawkins was never that clever, only masked it by criticizing religion.
I honestly feel sorry for these /pol/lacks.
>Atheist Richard Dawkins has admitted he is a “cultural Anglican” and believes it is important to educate people in the Bible so they understand history.
With considering the Bible it all starts, his conversion is only a matter of time now. Born in 1941 he gets closer to death now and exactly there people usually convert. He feels, he needs Jesus to get saved.
>He certainly took his time to see the merits of christian ethic. Silly man, how much damage has he done through the years?
Christianity did the damage to itself. People only listen to fedoras, if they don't experience the living God.
Beside this being a classical false flag troll, I wouldn't consider the opinion of anyone, who considers porn use as appropriate.
So in the end it doesn't matter which kind of feces you roll in and how you like them smell. You are still a full of feces.
>quippe ex voluntate perversa facta est libido, et dum servitur libidini, facta est consuetudo, et dum consuetudini non resistitur, facta est necessitas.
> People only listen to fedoras, if they don't experience the living God.
Are you saying I haven't been a good enough christian so as to be an example?
>Are you saying I haven't been a good enough christian so as to be an example?
I think the message to take from anon's remark is that Christianity has suffered from collective sins, you are taking as personal what is impersonal
I wasn't offended or anything like that. I did take it personally. Looking inward to what one does or doesn't is the best solution when pondering the state of the world.
She tried to get Murray Rothbard, who as also an atheist jew, to divorce his Christian wife, but he told her to winnie the pooh off, and he said Rand secretly held very different views to the ones she popularized.
He isn't pro-Christian, he just also happens to be anti-Islam too (unlike a lot of popular secularists). Stephan Molenxye (I don't know how to spell his name, the 'Not an argument' guy) said something like 'It's not that I agree with Christians, but right now we have to both deal with the guy threatening to blow up the whole court before we can go back to playing tennis (referring to debating Christianity). This was like 3 years ago though, I don't know how much he's changed.
"The rotten English protestants"
im on to your tricks, discord spy
which cord are you on
Spoonfeed me please
Children aren't allowed full participation in the Sacraments in the Ultramonatist Church. The Orthodox permits even infants to receive communion as it has since it was founded by Christ. The Catholics flipped on this issue in a spirit of scrupulousness. Their adult laity are also denied the Blood of Christ.
Me as the Orthodox Christian
>flesh doesn’t have blood in it
Really begs the question of why Christ even bothered with the Blood part at the Last Supper doesn't it?
>The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom
The precious blood is offered though
Just like how wine brings joy to a man's heart, the blood of Christ brings joy to a man's soul. The flesh already contains the blood of Christ in it. Thus it is redundant to drink the blood, though it still profits your soul to do so.
The reason why some masses don't serve the blood is because:
1. God forbid a klutz accidentally spill the blood on his/her clothes or the carpet
2. It is easier to prevent the spread of the flu and other disease when people aren't drinking from the same cup/eating from the same spoon.
The blood is offered though, what are you on about? Some churches don't offer the blood, but a lot do.
>The Catholics flipped on this issue in a spirit of scrupulousness.
No Church teaching implies or advocates for this.
Now show me some quotes from the Fathers that show that what you're saying has any root at all in holy tradition.
The Lord told us to "eat" and "drink". He told us that if one does not "eat His Flesh" and "drink His Blood" one cannot have eternal life. He didn't say "if you do not eat the Flesh of the Son of Man you cannot have life in you, also you can drink the Blood if you feel like it I guess". You're twisting the very words of Christ to justify a mistake that you could easily fix (and indeed that you are already fixing, although I've never seen a Roman Catholic parish offer the Blood, myself).
Utraquistanon, think about it. It both the body and blood were required for salvation, what happens to those whom have a medical condition where their mouth is wired shut or have celiac disease?
Also, if you want to play the show me where in the bible game prots love to play:
Show me where in the bible where Jesus says
>You must mix both the bread and the wine in a cup in order to fully partake in my flesh.
But to hopefully quench your thirst for the truth:
And let none eat or drink of your Eucharist but such as have been baptized into the name of the Lord, for of a truth the Lord hath said concerning this, Give not that which is holy unto dogs. ( 9:1-5)
As for the early Church Fathers none say that it is the utmost necessary to have both the body and blood as it was never an issue until the Hussites (proto-prots) threw a hissy fit and murdered people over it.
Meme unrelated to utraquistism, but relevant for a meme thread
A liberal Novus Ordo crypto-Protestant jesuit professor and papist schismatic was teaching a class on Pope Gregory the "Great", known heretic.
"Before the class begins, you must get on your knees and worship the Gregorian calendar and accept that it is the greatest written work the world has ever known, even greater than the Orthodox Study Bible!"
At this moment, a brave, traditional, anti-azymite Russion Orthodox champion whose beard was 1500 meters in length and who understood the necessity of infant communion and fully supported all ecclesiastic decisions made by the Patriarch of Moscow stood up and held up a copy of the Codex Vaticanus.
"How old is this book?"
The arrogant professor smirked quite Thomistically and smugly replied "Over 2000 years, you stupid Palamite."
"Wrong. It’s been 200 years since Rome fabricated created it. The oldest copy of the New Testament is the Codex Alexandrinus, which papists deny to legitimize their heresy."
The professor was visibly shaken, and dropped his chalk and copy of Summa Theologica. He stormed out of the room crying those romish crocodile tears.
The students applauded and all joined the Russian Orthodox Church that day and accepted Moscow as the Third Rome. A double-headed eagle named "Retake Constantinople" flew into the room and perched atop the Byzantine Cross and shed a tear on the chalk. The Nicene Creed (WITHOUT the Filioque) was read several times, and Saint Seraphim Rose himself showed up and anathematized all papists as non-trinitarians.
The professor lost his tenure and was fired the next day. He died in the error of Fillioquism and was tossed into Hades until such time as the prayers of faithful Orthodox Christians could fish him out.
Za Veru, Tsarya i Ot'echestvo
I would rather marry a Christian of other ethnicity than a identiarian or fascist .
I find it funny that someone thinks this is a bad thing.
Implying that we care. Sorry Hans, nobody is fighting in your 4th Reich to save apostate Europe from the ugly ugly fate that awaits it. There will be no rescue, except maybe from China if you're really unlucky. I really hope for your sake that they forgot about the boxer rebellion, but knowing them, I doubt it.
Lol maybe then those based Mongolians will save Europe; you'll be in the world's largest zoo run by the CCP. It will be called retard land and it will be 100% white and everyone will be a based ethno-nationalist. It will also be a Chinese prison camp for dissidents. But at least they'll treat the blacks worse, am I right?
>even greater than the Orthodox Study Bible
Neat, my defence of lewd-free kemonos and furries made into the meme page uwu
>those choice of images
You're not helping.
No, I didn’t post any image; I just said that there are furries who are not in the fandom due to the lewd material but rather as a creative outlet. Even if I am not justifying the general progressive attitude of most of the community.
>Ywn have a qt catholic gf with nekomimi, choker and glasses
Worst part is, neither will I have any kind of gf whatsoever.
I'll pray for you, Anon.
Being anti-white is Jewish.
I know that a choker is just a way for most girls to show they take it up the arse but the accentuation of that neckline drives me wild.
If you really want to pray for me: there's this qt girl that came over a few times at our chapel with her mom but even her mom hasn't come by anymore.
Please pray she comes over again, then at least I can ask/give her my number.
Sounds like lust to me.
I like chokers, but I wonder if they're a collar symbol, which would mean liking them is disordered.
So is homophobia, according to some.
Everything about homosexuality (the very existence of the term itself) and everything related to it is jewish.
>/r/ orthodox bird/protestant raven .mp4
Is it lust if you like how it looks and accentuates a woman (genuine question tbh)?
>I wonder if they're a collar symbol
If you mean a priestly collar then no, it has always existed as some kind of necklace/fashion item.
No, homosexuality is a proud aryan tradition.
Greek pagans were not unique in this regard. Look at the Persians or the Japanese or Mesoamericans, pretty much all pagan empires were degenerate as hell. Not surprising, as they worshipped demons.
But whilst they were degenerate, they didn't identify as "homosexuals". The idea of sexuality as an identity itself is modern, I think that's what the guy you were responding too meant.
I meant more like a dog collar or fetish slave collar, that kind of thing.
Yes, I'm aware. I was talking about the act of sodomy.
>proud aryan tradition.
are you one of those guys that always does damage control in /pol/ everytime the whole trap questions comes up?
No, I don't even browse /pol/ so I don't know who you're refering to. If you thought my post was pro-homo, you were wrong.
They were a symbol for prostitution or lesbianism according to urban dictionary. Honestly, a lot of girls who wear chokers nowadays tend to be harlots.
Depends why you like it. If you like it because it sexually excites you then yes it is obviously lust.
>Honestly, a lot of girls who wear chokers nowadays tend to be harlots.
Well, that's the problem too.
I always thought it was a stylized submission collar. Is it wrong that I liked them believing that?
Yes, da joos were behind sola scripture, as Protestantism was their plan all along (hence why Luther was an anti- Semite!)
>If you like it because it sexually excites you then yes it is obviously lust.
Is lust inside of marriage a sin? If you made your wife wear a choker or other sexy clothing around the house, would that be sinful?
>(hence why Luther was an anti- Semite!)
This actually means nothing.
What do you mean?
Good to see fellow resistance here, I sometimes fear I am alone.
How and why would they benefit them?
I don't think it's lust if you're married to her.
So the Jews are guilty for something they had no part in but still benefited their religion?
can I get sauce on 2nd and 3rd songs?
It's Odin, you can kinda see the eye-patch on his right eye
this is me on so many levels holy shit
Nah, man, IMO the original one was better. The joke was the thought that shitty atheist arguments can topple Christian religion; it's absurd, yet many people believe it. I find that your version lacks the irony the first one had.
It's still praiseworthy that you take the time to do some christian OC, though, so kudos for that.
aside from the buying alcohol and drugs that sounds insanely accurate. whats sad is that i cant go to church as my family would disown me. my mother is a witch and she is blinded by lies and illusions likely by demons. i must endure this grave period of my life and i shall be free
>Debates himself over if he is a reprobate or not
>Debates himself over if he is a reprobate or not due to temptations of the flesh
Yeah that's me almost to a T.
Except that didn't solve anything and gave a satisfying answe and that question is much also much more older.
Fair enough, didn't even look at the original that way. Just saw David and Goliath and was too autistic to not think "Wut? I'm sure we all know whats about to happen though, shouldn't it be the other way around?"
Sounds rather dire friend, have faith though, I'm sure you can make it through this. We're here with you.
I think it is. Your wife dressing up in seductive clothing would make her a seductress. Sex is only for procreation.
Yeah, good luck with that. Let's go full Augustine and ban people from modifying their clothes, too.
Sex is for procreation and union.
I don't know if I got the time to do this in color; can someone trace over this and color this image, in mspaint or otherwise?
lemme edit that just a wee bit; the type is kinda important to it here
I know. I simply described how Odin looked like according to mythology.
Does anyone have the Christchan "Absolutely anti logos" meme and could share please? Thanks!
>Does anyone have the Christchan "Absolutely anti logos" meme and could share please? Thanks!
I don't have it, but I have the "Absolutley anti-logos" meme if you want.
9 days since the last post in the meme thread? That is sinful.
Looks like you made a mistake there, let me fix it for you
Combined pork and shellfish with wearing mixed fabrics
Claims Christmas/Easter is a pagan holiday
Equivocates Christian = Jew
Claims Christianity was invented in the Middle Ages by borrowing from pagans
Assumes forgiveness is Jewish propaganda for complacency
Not bad, but just one mistake.
The idea is that, assuming the numbers are right, they convert way more people and reach out to them more than us by a mile. I’m saying that we should get more people so we can save more people
the iberians were there for longer and the muslims were invaders
>implying Muslims 'settled', not invaded
Spaniard here, History graduate. Yes, the muslims were settled. Not only that, the vast majority of muslims were original hispanics (that is, native from Hispania) who had converted. When the Muslims were ousted from Granada, there's no historic argument that can legitimize it: they had been there for longer than the Visigoths back in their day. The age of conquests (or "reconquest", though that term is bullshit invented in the XIX century) was also long gone (it extends from the 1000s to the late 1200s).
So, was the conquest of the moors and their expulsion wrong? Absolutely not. Islam is wicked and should be ousted wherever found. There's no distinction between church and state, and serving Allah is indistinguishable from sheepishly serving your governor. Islam is the religion of peace, because "islam" means peace, but not a peace among equals as we understand it in the West, no: it's a peace of submission, since "islam" can also be more accurately translated as "submission".
It always annoys me to see this historical arguments to legitimize certain actions against islam. Those arguments are not needed. Islam is an evil religion and should always be opposed. That's all the arguments and legitimacy you need.
>the vast majority of muslims were original hispanics
It's easy to convert people if they got conquered and then had to pay extra taxes.
Some tend to forget that.
Could you maybe make one with two pictures of saints?
One from an icon and one from a western-style painting would be the best I think.
Goliath looks like Sam Hyde.
Is the link between Ayn Rand and Satanism true??
Anything apart from Catholicism (at least from a Catholics perspective) has some form of Satanic influence. Also my personal opinion is that the highest form of Satanism is actually probably what was described by our Lord in the Gospels and in the Book of Revelation. I don't think this LARPy occult Satanism is the highest form of Satanism.
This made me laugh; thanks, anon, I needed a bit of laughter in my days lately. :)
OC Fresh from oven
I don't get it, maybe I'm too old? I'm becoming a boomer
Nah, it’s a meme about CathLARPers, I think. Or a jab at Catholic faith in general.
Judging by the images of Catholic venerating the Madonna, I suspect a bitter Protestant is behind this: they love to claim the Cats worship her.
5/10, despite the good effort.
Someone posted pic related in another thread, and he didn't put it here too?
The catholic chuch utterly BTFO
hurt my eyes but interesting points
This is utter garbage.
I like it.
Just a thought: The preeminence of Peter might have actually sparked a discussion about who was the greatest in Heaven. Jesus establishes Peter's authority over His Church and the Apostles (in line with his 'first shall be last and last shall be first' paradoxes) starts questioning: "Okay, so if Peter is the first among us here, who will be the greatest in Heaven?" or "Just because he's in charge, doesn't mean he's the best of us – Jesus kind of has a tendency to pick the worst people for the best jobs."
I think Paul publicly rebuking Peter cannot be a sound basis, dissent among the apostles was arguably as normal as it is for their successors today but Matthew 18 is interesting when you think about it like that.
Okay, this is epic.
Cool meme, but could you make this in a higher resolution with more clarity?
I just grabbed it online. srry
There are these tho
In my search for that specific one I found these
>that first image
I knew a guy who was really interested in viking history he was a christian, he just was really interested in the history supposedly. I stopped paying attention to his supposed expertise when he told me that the Thor movies, especially Dark World, were super accurate to the mythology.
>he told me that the Thor movies, especially Dark World, were super accurate to the mythology
Next he'll tell you the Sword in the Stone is an accurate depiction of Le Morte D'Arthur and that the Beowulf movie was good.