[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / ausneets / b2 / choroy / dempart / freeb / vichan ]

/k/ - Weapons

Salt raifus and raifu accessories
Winner of the 82rd Attention-Hungry Games
/tikilounge/ - Relax, take it easy

June 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


There's no discharge in the war!

File: 67582dbea036efb⋯.jpg (19.74 KB, 381x400, 381:400, flintenWeiber.jpg)

cacb0c  No.674388

It is well-known that Soviet female soldiers were capable of fighting a war, following rules of engagement, etc. It is not easy to confirm that they were as good as men for surviving a harsh battlefield environment, carrying heavy packs, etc.

Oddly, the USA, the PRC, and the CIS all follow a "modern" mindset and thus believe that women should be available as warfighters. Why have modern female warfighters failed to produce results as good as the Flintenweiber of World War 2?

Background:

With 12 air victories, fighter pilot Lidya Litvyak was the best female hotshot not only of WWII, but of all times. She was killed in action on August 1, 1943, when she was only 21.

Yekaterina Budanova was female ace number 2, and a friend of Lidiya Litvyak. She is credited with 11 victories. Budanova never saw the end of the war, since she was killed in 1943 at the age of 26.

Shortly after the start of WWII, Maria Oktyabrskaya sold all her possessions to donate toward acquiring a tank for the war effort. She christened the tank “Fighting Girlfriend,” and received a personal allowance from Stalin to become its driver mechanic, the first woman in the world who became such. Maria Oktyabrskaya was fatally wounded in northern Belorussia in 1944, when she was 38.

The first woman decorated as a Hero of the Soviet Union during WWII, Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya acted as a saboteur in the German rear. She was caught, tortured and hanged on November 21, 1941, when she was only 18. Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya became one of the most popular symbols of the Nazi resistance in the Soviet Union.

Natalya Meklin was a link commander in the famous 46th Guards Night Bomber Regiment, widely known as the “Night Witches.” She completed 980 combat missions. Successfully surviving the war, Meklin died in 2005 at the age of 82.

Credited with 309 kills, Lyudmila Pavlichenko is regarded not only as sniper number 1 among women, but also as one of the best snipers overall. In 1942 she visited the USA as a part of a Soviet delegation and met President Franklin Roosevelt. Pavlichenko died in 1974 at the age of 58.

A link commander in the “Night Witches” regiment, Tatyana Makarova was killed in action on August 25, 1944, in the skies over Poland. She was 23 years old.

Female tank operator Alexandra Samusenko was a T-34 tank commander and the only woman deputy commander of the tank battalion. The 23-year-old Samusenko died of wounds on March 3, 1945.

Soviet sniper Roza Shanina was known for her capacity of […] hitting two targets with two rounds fired in quick succession. Before she was killed at the age of 20 on January 28, 1945, Shanina eliminated 59 enemy soldiers and officers.

The most senior female sniper, Nina Petrova was 46 when the Great Patriotic War started. She voluntarily joined the army and managed to eliminate 122 enemy soldiers during the whole period. She died in a car crash on the very eve of victory – May 1, 1945.

https://www.rbth.com/history/328548-soviet-women-who-contributed-victory

24ab5d  No.674391

Nice cherry picking, faggot. Anything looks good when you use logical fallacy and bad arguments, you are selling us a load of horseshit. Women can't handle heavy packs and women in the military afterward, with far better documentation, have problems with hip fractures and other bone issues when doing regular soldier things. Old men are sometimes the very, very best of soldiers, but old conscripts are to be avoided because they aren't good at fighting and they also suffer high rates of non combat casualties from medical issues and old bodies not keeping up on the march. Women are like old conscripts, they suffer very high rates of non combat casualties, the harder the physical strain the more problems you have. Let's not even mention all the pregnency and other issues in that nature.

So, you have some cherry picked examples? So small numbers of women were drafted for combat, the best of the best were picked, and then OP picks the best of the best of them to make a weak paper think argument about how great they are in battle. Well, faggot, what about all the ones that weren't the best? The ones that weren't aces and high end snipers? How good were they really? Can the results we've seen in these small numbers of best women have any relevance to general women in combat, and the State's desire to draft them for battle? Isn't women in combat roles nothing more than two things, 1. Retard ideology (there is no such thing as a non retarded ideology) 2. the State's desire to use its population as nothing more than a resource to be squandered and wasted for its own will and doesn't like the idea that half the population can't be freely exploited.

CAN women handle male training standards? Can they handle special forces ever? Outside of a few shining examples (that we can hope aren't Soviet propaganda) do they actually stand up in combat or are they dead weight? Are they the old conscripts that will constantly suffer injuries that require them to be pulled out and take resources?

Get your head out of the mythos. If you are a shill take the money they paid you to buy a silk rope. Now, I don't condone suicide, but tie a noose and think about killing yourself at least. You deserve that.

Last of all, war is made to protect people and property, land and nation. We fight to protect women and children. its what we do. When you start using women as cannon fodder, you have become the evil in this world we fight to stop. It proves the State has absolutely no value in human life or other values. Just people as things to be used like so much piles of gravel.


657dde  No.674392

>>674391

>o small numbers of women were drafted for combat, the best of the best were picked, and then OP picks the best of the best of them to make a weak paper think argument about how great they are in battle.

That's not what happened at all you fucking retard. OP asked why hasn't there been any women comparable to them. Learn how to read before sperging out, you dumb nigger.


cacb0c  No.674399

>>674391

>So, you have some cherry picked examples?

The background about Soviet heroes was just copy-and-pasted. I should have been more circumspect. For example, it is possible the Soviets lied about Pavlichenko and Shanana's kills in order to build up pro-Soviet propaganda.

To give a better idea of the numbers involved, I should have quoted sources such as this:

>Between 1941 and 1945, a total of 2,484 soviet female snipers were functioning in this role, of whom about 500 survived the war.[7][8] Their combined tally of kill claims is at least 11,000.[9] The most famous snipers during the war included Lyudmila Pavlichenko and Roza Shanina.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_women_in_World_War_II

Once again, I should be cautious because it's possible these women did not really kill 11,000 enemies. We only have the word of the Soviets on that score. However, some other snipers in history have had impressive kill counts.

Furthermore, it is possible that Soviet women in 1940 were healthier and stronger than the average woman of the 21st century. This might explain why Pavlichenko did not break a leg and flunk out of sniper school.

Notably, it seems that only 500 out of nearly 2500 girl snipers survived the war. This casualty rate might be unacceptable for modern armies.


a81d80  No.674400

A government low on males forced females to join and have them shoot civilians. So?


b66853  No.674402

>>674388

Most, if not all of them, were peasant women engaged in the tasks of 1930s peasants their entire life.

That includes a whole lot of heavy physical work that's just not done anymore. It's guaranteed that they had a stronger body than nearly all modern women, and probably than a good amount of modern men.


cacb0c  No.674404

>>674402

So, the average Soviet woman was extremely physically fit by modern standards. Then, the sample size of recruited women was apparently large:

>There were 800,000 women who served in the Soviet Armed Forces during the war,[1] which is roughly 3 percent of total military personnel.[2] The number of women in the Soviet military in 1943 was 348,309, 473,040 in 1944, and then 463,503 in 1945.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_women_in_World_War_II

Out of that 800,000, there were perhaps 2500 snipers plus a small number of pilots. So, the initial criticism of "cherry-picking" has some mathematical basis.


67356e  No.674406

>>674388

>Why have modern female warfighters failed to produce results as good as the Flintenweiber of World War 2?

The easiest answer is most likely that because there hasn't been a single war in the last 70 years that warranted the front-line deployment of women in considerable numbers and because for a variety of biological, social, and psychological elements, very few women are have the right mindset and physicality to be successful in warfare.

Due to the above you see a drop in the total number of successful female fighters today who are deployed in low intensity COIN and policing missions in the upwards of a few hundreds as compared to say women in the Soviet Union who were deployed in high-intensity battlefields int he measure of hundreds of thousands.


cacb0c  No.674407

>>674391

> what about all the ones that weren't the best? The ones that weren't aces and high end snipers? How good were they really? Can the results we've seen in these small numbers of best women have any relevance to general women in combat, and the State's desire to draft them for battle?

Given the 1940s Soviet population and a willingness to enlist huge numbers, it seems that 1 out of every 320 Soviet women was ready for battle. (Modern populations would probably be much less battle-ready.)

>Last of all, war is made to protect people and property, land and nation. We fight to protect women and children. its what we do. When you start using women as cannon fodder, you have become the evil in this world we fight to stop. It proves the State has absolutely no value in human life or other values. Just people as things to be used like so much piles of gravel.

Out of 2500 women snipers, 80% died in the war, so your argument that the Soviets used women as cannon fodder seems appropriate.


4f0542  No.674415

File: 1a29abbadbc9f71⋯.jpg (87.54 KB, 953x960, 953:960, 1551988213_braim damage.jpg)

>>674388

>believing anything coming from sovee "documentation"


b7ba14  No.674456

>>674388

Five minutes spent with women in the military will completely derail any attempt to make them to fight.


917679  No.674559

File: 150fc90f34bc1cf⋯.jpeg (90.35 KB, 605x849, 605:849, 3954606F-325C-4D34-98B1-3….jpeg)

*love noises*


df2604  No.674561

File: c69186c81b0954e⋯.jpg (1.37 MB, 1860x1880, 93:94, Women in the army screenca….jpg)

File: 0e47d97c349f87e⋯.png (751.12 KB, 1363x2406, 1363:2406, Women in the army 2.png)

File: bb3f6d0b4d111c9⋯.jpg (3.27 MB, 3056x3483, 3056:3483, statistics.jpg)

>muh kills


3ac49d  No.674562

>>674559

Next time you better win.

What are some lessons learned from the last one anyway? I assume logistical issues and overextension will be major improvements on the next one.


8660ca  No.674563

Are they 2D? Then go ahead.

Are they 3D? You don't. Unless you have them around as a secretary, nurse, or a base slut to keep up morale for some troops.


bced41  No.674564

>>674561

Very informative redpills. I will pass these on. Thanks.


82923f  No.674573

>>674388

That some of the dumbest made-up commie propaganda I've ever read.


82923f  No.674574

>>674399

>jewish website wikipedia uses jewish commie propaganda as sources

sounds legit


aee381  No.674582

File: 239cf0bb228598d⋯.png (71.56 KB, 559x537, 559:537, sniper456456.PNG)

They didn't fly so good!


fb0f11  No.674593

>>674559

was germany experimenting with breast growth shit? so many pictures of german women with wunder waffens.


e7680d  No.674596

>>674593

>can't tell apart soviet and German uniforms

>likes udders

Checks out, liking uselss sacks of fat that ruin the female form is a sign of low intelligence.


df2604  No.674601

File: c25d4e1f698e891⋯.png (17.67 KB, 519x241, 519:241, Untitled.png)

>>674582

Sepp Allerberger is one tough fucker


e3ea56  No.674605

>>674388

>believing soviet propaganda

Yikes!


721a9d  No.674606

>>674601

Got a PDF for his book?


df2604  No.674608

>>674606

You will have to use an ebook reader to open it. I personally use 'Calibre', it's free and kikery-free.

http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=A1F11CAB80F7BAA4FB0E48DE8EFA0663


aee381  No.674618

File: 2ee823e0e3ddf1d⋯.pdf (2.6 MB, sniper on the eastern fron….pdf)

>>674606

Knock yourself out. Eye-opening book.

It's actually interesting to note that his official score isn't true, because of how the kills were being confirmed by the command.


6b5a6a  No.674632

File: 96fe526af7fd1ce⋯.jpg (33.63 KB, 524x522, 262:261, 96fe526af7fd1ce9cc3e3081e5….jpg)

>>674388

>Why have modern female warfighters failed to produce results as good as the Flintenweiber of World War 2?

>With 12 air victories

That's it right there. Women can be as effective when operating machines. If you want women on the battlefield, you need to put them in tanks, planes, and other armored vehicles so they can operate crew served weapons. Those weapons don't depend on the physical strength or speed of the individual operating them, they only need a human component to designate targets and direct the machine.

Make GuP real.


9f978d  No.674634

>>674632

That's pretty at shit for a supposedly above average female.


a3ca61  No.674642

>>674391

>>674388

>>674399

>>674574

I recall reading something in Russian about the whole training program and by the end of the war they were solely training women as sniper.

It was their conclusion after a fairly documented study they made during the war, that while overall men snipers performed better in combat, women snipers were more focused in training and easier to train, reducing the school time period to reach the sets goal of marksmanship/stealthness, etc…

And since quantity>quality was always the soviet motto they ended up training only women in the last year(s?).

Also note that a soviet sniper kit is nowhere near what a modern riflemen kit carries.

It's a rifle, a scope a handful of ammo (50rnds), maybe some grenades, a coat/tent/camo, an shovel/axe/blade, a canteen/mess/kit, a potato sack with a change of clothes, personal knickknacks, maybe rations (field kitchen fed the troops, kitchen staff had hunting parties attached…) and that's it.

The heaviest piece of equipment is either the rifle or the winter uniform (that one would wear).

That's one of the jokes about WWII german infantry came with barbers and dentists, soviet infantry came with extra artillery shells (as in often the soldiers on the march were each carrying a shells from one dump to another on foot… because they could).


7af10f  No.674645

>>674642

It's pure bullshit since the womyn sniper battlations were gradually dismissed after the war (one of the female vet was even getting pissy about it).


fa1646  No.674665

>>674596

>liking uselss sacks of fat that ruin the female form is a sign of low intelligence.

<being gay


7cb4fe  No.674685

>>674562

Invade from the east (and on horses)


bced41  No.674691

>>674642

>while overall men snipers performed better in combat, women snipers were more focused in training and easier to train, reducing the school time period to reach the sets goal of marksmanship/stealthness, etc…

>

>And since quantity>quality was always the soviet motto they ended up training only women in the last year(s?).

I will pass along that redpill, and will continue looking for sources. If you ever remember the title, please post it so I can give a source.


90a1cf  No.674775

File: d69229c0698841c⋯.webm (209.75 KB, 480x270, 16:9, r u retarded.webm)

>>674388

Jesus fucking Christ, OP you are a faggot of the highest degree.

Next you'll be telling us about Zaitsev really killing 6 gorillion soldiers because kikepedia told you so?

Are you mentally retarded?


90a1cf  No.674776

>>674775

>>674388

And don't you try the cop out of 'I just need a redpill, lulz".

Lurk 2 more years before never posting again and killing yourself.

If we have to keep redpilling every Billie and Jimmie on every single normie issue, we'd be here all day, never getting anything done, like cuckchan or reddit. Which is incidentally where you belong.

Sage for doublepost and irrelevancy of this thread in general.


bced41  No.674793

File: 956d8480c52c9f7⋯.png (417.59 KB, 851x484, 851:484, girlandbear.PNG)

>>674775

>Are you mentally retarded?

Are you butthurt because Krautland got beaten by Commies and now pays tithes and tribute to Our Greatest Ally?


a2f3f8  No.674797

File: 8192e32acdee47f⋯.png (3.11 MB, 1422x1016, 711:508, ClipboardImage.png)

>>674793

This kills the kraut.


a3ca61  No.674802

>>674645

>after the war.

Operating word here being AFTER the war.

Stalin had enough feminism under Lenin and basically all women personnel were given the boot almost everywhere (including in civil society) the minute the war ended. The soviet always pushed radical feminism everywhere but they never applied it back home (except in the early days which led to a near total social collapse of the soviet union, which is why they were pushing it to the west…).

Snipers battalions being mostly women by that point, the formation itself was disbanded entirely by 1947, by Korea motostrelki had become the basic unit pretty much in the same shape as today, with one sniper attached to each platoon leader (and you can recreate a sniper platoon/company/battalion per battalion/brigade-regiment/division should the need arise).


b2bcf5  No.674813

>>674593

Hops. They're so intense an estrogenic that traditionally only women harvested them, and just handling them often lead to breast growth.


4f0542  No.674844


bcd187  No.674845

>>674844

Beer turns you into a tranny.


1af3e3  No.674878

>>674593

That's a Soviet uniform on the woman. I wish Japan would toughen the fuck up and let us take back the occupied islands just so I can leave behind a trail of Australasiatic children in the midst.

>>674596

>uselss sacks of fat

You take that back right now.


056061  No.674879

File: a885f16834bc28a⋯.png (505.92 KB, 1000x1432, 125:179, a885f16834bc28a18e90e6cafb….png)

>>674793

>>674797

>allying themselves with the honest to god mongoloids that rape everything that comes across them

>he's actually proud of this.

Look how well that came out for you.


c989b2  No.674889

>>674388

I forget who made the analysis, but I remember hearing that German and Russian soldiers were rated the highest for fighting an actual patriotic war during ww2 compared to the US (the lowest), Italy, and England. If you look at the death ratios between sides, it's not hard to see that Germans and Soviets generally cared more about winning and fighting for their nation/people than anyone else. The average woman in the military today is only in it for egotism, money, or pregnancy leave. That being said, women just aren't as cut out for being out in the field more than 1 month. Especially Amerifat women.

T. I spend a lot of time in the bush taking forest inventory for my job. The 2 women I've worked with so far is a very rotund lefty grad student, the other is a Czech girl in her 30s yet more youthful than the Amerifat. The big girl can't seem to handle more than a few days of work a week.

The only American women who have the stamina to be in the field come from the Appalachian mountains where you can't get anywhere without it. And even among them, Walmart and mntn dew have left their mark. I really hope the globohomo deflates itself eventually.


9ba503  No.674899

>>674596

>he doesn't like big tiddies

Are you gay?


cd22de  No.674916

>>674596

The next thing you’ll say is that liking dick is a sign of intelligence. You’re not fooling anyone, Magyar.


a3ca61  No.674923

>>674562

>Next time you better win.

>Germany.

>Winning wars.

Did Germany/Prussia ever won a war that wasn't a germanic civil war besides 1870 (which a toddler could have won)?

Germany is France on steroids, their specialty is winning battles and losing wars.


5983a0  No.674928

>>674923

You're right, but that is true of almost all states and nations. True strategic as opposed to tactical or operational talent is very rare. We still exist; that is enough.


a2f3f8  No.674955

File: 32cc030c84d5e2e⋯.png (198.2 KB, 500x347, 500:347, ClipboardImage.png)

>>674879

>allying themselves with the honest to god mongoloids that rape everything that comes across them

>be jerries

>at war with britain

>decide to declare war on USSR

>"WHOAH, WHY DID BRITAIN AND THE USSR ALLY WITH EACH OTHER?"

Soviet rape of Germany and Poland best day of my life, at least the rapebabies have the DNA of men who know how to win a war.


5cd75e  No.674962

>>674916

The last one who should call someone else a degenerate is you, burger.


3bf37f  No.674964

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>674955

There is a reason why England is now New Pakistan.

t.John Edmund.


7af10f  No.674969

>>674802

After the war, the Soviet sits on the biggest land force in Europe.

If muh womyn snipers were actually effective, they would kept it like the legion of T-34.


5a1c4e  No.674973

File: 504c5669163dac9⋯.png (428.11 KB, 558x744, 3:4, 1496491387591.png)

>>674632

Except they scientifically aren't, their spacial awareness and reaction time are objectively and notably worse than men's


40c7d1  No.674981

File: 3aaeefe8f3bc812⋯.jpg (114.95 KB, 720x712, 90:89, hate ray.jpg)

>>674955

>Be perfidious anglo

>Tell Poland you'll protect them

>Both Germans and Soviets invade Poland

>Declare war on Jerry but not Ivan

>Don't move a finger until Poland is well and truly flattened

Daily reminder that teaniggers' only guiding principle is "what can we do to make life worse for the continentals".


bdf387  No.674992

>>674981

>"what can we do to make life worse for the continentals".

What a beautiful policy. In all seriousness though, the Brits should have either declared war on both or neither, and Australia shouldn't have had any involvement in any of the wars we have been in.


7639fc  No.674994

>>674964

>>674981

The more time passes, the harder it gets to tell who really won the war. Mainstream historiography mostly restricts itself to analysis at the nation-state level, but if one accepts the NS/racial view of history (i. e. WW2 as a racial war between world jewry and the European peoples) it's clear that F, UK and with a slight delay the US cannot be unanimously called victors of that conflict.


7639fc  No.674995

>>674992

The old english policy of dividing the continent stopped making sense the moment two extra-european power blocks appeared. Brits missed the geopolitical train, independent of the matter of jewish infiltration.


736db3  No.674998

>>674994

Only jews won that conflict since both the victors (USA, brits and USSR) were jew pawns and were discarded as such.

Or hell, Israel might be considered the victor because through the aid of literal superpowers, it officially becomes a thing just a year after the war ends.


3e7f36  No.675015

>>674981

>decide to declare war on ussr

<fucking anglo doesn't know that USSR was already preparing to invade the Europe no matter what, and Germany's attack was only a pre-emptive strike


3e7f36  No.675016


b6ed97  No.675039

>>674793

>got beaten by Commies

>Republic of China

Top kek, at least the Krauts got to keep 2/3rds of their land, you’re isolated to a single island because of your own commies, and are entirely dependent on the U.S. to keep that.


0efc3a  No.675072

>>675039

>entirely dependent on the U.S.

so are you, leafnigger


a2f3f8  No.675097

>>674981

>Daily reminder that teaniggers' only guiding principle is "what can we do to make life worse for the continentals".

>implying that's a bad thing

>>675019

t. le 75% face

>muh rape gangs

Yeah, it's so much better when gangs of niggers just mass rape random German girls in the middle of streets in broad daylight instead.

>subhuman

t. got defeated by subhumans

>muh muhammad

You realise it's the most common name in Berlin too, right? Nigger pot calling the kettle a nigger.

>>675015

>>675016

>muh USSR wuz aggressors

Unrelated to my post.


6525a3  No.675158

File: 3a17b9ef6ccfb08⋯.jpg (103.78 KB, 640x905, 128:181, 1556805902_Graphik-Bundesl….jpg)

>>675097

>>675097

>You realise it's the most common name in Berlin too, right?

No proof. I dont expect the truth from an inferior animal though.

I dont expect more from a subhuman.

Even, even if it were true, Berlin is not the size of the whole of england. It nothing you said is true, subhuman.

>muh niggers ganging up therefore niggers are better

Typical nigger saxon mindset. I guess shitskins are your next aristocracy now, since they legally took over the toilet bowl that is london.

>muh köln

Which ended with shitskins being hated forever now. Your breeding stables are still operational.


b4bf98  No.675159

>>674388

The common female soviet soldier lived a 1940s Russian farmers live before that and had already war experience thanks to the previous Russian Civil.

They are hardly comparable to today's women. AND THATS A HUGE POINT!

Women in the 1930/1940 were overall more badass compared to the female losers we have today and they were barley good enough for a last ditch effort.

Today's women are utter garbage, yet we expect them so outperform these desperate women, who despite their awesomeness weren't a match for the men.


a2f3f8  No.675167

>>675158

>no proof

https://www.bz-berlin.de/berlin/mohammed-beliebtester-erstname-in-berlin

>Even, even if it were true, Berlin is not the size of the whole of england

>implying london is all of England

The stupid, swarthy German showing the typical intellect of his breed, the type of intellect that lead them to declaring war on both the USSR and the USA and wondering why they lost.


b79e41  No.675179

File: 5a345beed7ba200⋯.png (91.55 KB, 1791x425, 1791:425, ww2 lendlease.png)

>>675097

>t. got defeated by subhumans

by subhumans supported by other subhumans who bankrupted themselves to help them

>Unrelated to my post.

<claims that Third Reich needlessly attacked the soviets

<the fact that soviets were preparing to steamroll europe for the SECOND TIME ALREADY is unrelated

you're pretending, right?


c74763  No.675180

File: 3decd25ba4fa82f⋯.jpg (74.45 KB, 630x840, 3:4, soviet-censorship-naval-co….jpg)

>>674632

<planes

>What are G-forces

>What is 4 women in a tank, all on their period

Also, are you not paying attention to how easily women get anxiety and depression? They do not take pressure well. The differences between men and women are not just physical, they're mental, too.

>>674415

/thread

>>674388

Dear faggot OP, you need to read about the Soviet Union's tendency to falsify basically everything. Read about coalminer Alexey Stakhanov as an example of how they manufactured a hero:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexey_Stakhanov

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stakhanovite_movement

tl;dr They attributed an entire shift of coalminer's productiviy to one man. They did it so they could go to all the other coalminers and say, "This is what we expect of you." Of course I can't prove it, but I suspect the same is true of their stories of female tankers and snipers and fighter pilots. They attributed other people's kills to them, so they could go to the rest of the women and say, "This is what we expect of you." After all, even goyim women exist only to serve (((their bolshevik masters))).


2fffde  No.675182

>>675180

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panfilov%27s_Twenty-Eight_Guardsmen

tl;dr: they fabricated a story about a unit of 28 soldiers who were wiped out to the last man, even though some of them survived. When they found it out, they threw the survivors into the prison.


a2f3f8  No.675209

Test, thread is acting fucky


a2f3f8  No.675211

File: 4b7b3af2c9179d5⋯.png (6.2 MB, 2480x1690, 248:169, Anglo-Russian dabbage.png)

>>675179

>by subhumans supported by other subhumans

I know it may be hard to understand for a pole, but civilised nations have a notion of comradery and helping your allies out in a time of need. (((Hitler))) shouldn't have declared war on Russia if he didn't want us to swamp them with lend-lease.

<claims that Third Reich needlessly attacked the soviets

I'm not claiming that the krauts declared war on Russia for no reason, what I'm saying is that it shouldn't've been a surprise to them that Britain and Russia immediately allied afterwards.


b79e41  No.675228

File: ab64d795c1859ed⋯.png (617.75 KB, 503x628, 503:628, losing it.png)

>>675211

> civilised nations have a notion of comradery and helping your allies out in a time of need.

>helping your allies

>I know it may be hard to understand for a pole,

>for a pole

>helping allies

>pole

The irony is so strong here that it almost killed me.


e91552  No.675236

>>675211

Are you a kike? That would explain your idiotic trolling.

But the anglo-russian alliance was true - both countries were ruled by a small Jewish elite which hated it's native white population. That's also the reason why British girls are raped en masse by brown rape gangs and the police of airstrip one protects them and throws anyone who criticizes the mass immigration of muslims into prison. The jewish endgoal is the eradication of the white race.


9cbdc8  No.675242

>>674969

>HURR DURR I'M A SUBHUMAN, ONE GENETIC STRAND FROM AN ABO§§§

Jesus H Christ, is it the agent orange? The STD your mom got from a burger?

What part of "it was easier to train women" = it was useful in a time of total war, don't you fucking understand?

The Soviet Union had the biggest forces in Europe… because it was the most populated country you fucking genius, even if you piled up everyone from NATO you still didn't reach the number of people in the USSR.

It doesn't mean they were anywhere close to wartime levels of mobilization.

Soviet soldiers were guys doing their military service, called up every 6 months when they reach the service age…

And they were therefore all men, with women only working (as "contracted" personnel, not mandatory servicemen) in rear services like everywhere else.


000000  No.675249

>>675242

There was not a single man in the Soviet Union who was born in 1924-1925. Adolf got them all. Tell me russians are not a subhumans.


b2bcf5  No.675251

File: 17580e64cf8fdb2⋯.jpg (30.41 KB, 500x375, 4:3, 17580e64cf8fdb281bee724b0f….jpg)

>this entire thread


9cbdc8  No.675265

>>675251

>Not this entire board.


736db3  No.675270

>>675242

Prove to me it is easier to train womyn, and if it easier, why didn't the Soviet maintain a contigency force of wonyn after the war.

That shit sounds like horseshit at the highest caliber.


736db3  No.675271

>>674642

>I recall reading something in Russian about the whole training program and by the end of the war they were solely training women as sniper.

>It was their conclusion after a fairly documented study they made during the war, that while overall men snipers performed better in combat, women snipers were more focused in training and easier to train, reducing the school time period to reach the sets goal of marksmanship/stealthness, etc…

>And since quantity>quality was always the soviet motto they ended up training only women in the last year(s?)

This claim was horseshit from day one.

If at some point in the war, the kikes did find a way to train WOMYN SNIPER faster than the men, the amount of WOMYN SNIPER should have outnumbered by the end of the war.

Surprise, it didn't happen.

And if this study was true, then post-war, kike snipers would be made of 50% women or more simply because they would be easier to train than men, thus waste less time and resources spent on time. Once again, post-war, WOMYN SNIPERS were entirely disbanded and no new ones were trained.

Fuck off kike.


27b7d5  No.675306

File: b8968a3a2f2d223⋯.jpg (58.38 KB, 430x474, 215:237, a568768jhtj.jpg)

>>675242

>What part of "it was easier to train women" = it was useful in a time of total war, don't you fucking understand?

If it was easier to train women, why didn't Germans train them and make them join Volkssturm?


c836df  No.675307

>>675271

Let me try to get it through your that cloud of Agent Orange fogging your vision:

>ww2: total war

<might as well send the women to the front line

>after ww2: not total war

<women should stay home and breed


0a11e9  No.675312

>>675307

>women are worthless as everything but as a last resort

That's what we've been saying the entire thread.


c74763  No.675314

File: b6c3daf47e8081f⋯.webm (8.58 MB, 640x360, 16:9, Adolf_Hitler's_speech_on_….webm)

>>675306

>If it was easier to train women, why didn't Germans train them and make them join Volkssturm?

Start at 2:16, but I encourage you to watch the whole .webm. The (((bolsheviks))) were willing to send women into combat because they were Russian women and they didn't care about them, in fact they wanted a lot of Russians dead anyways. The National Socialists weren't willing to send women into combat because they were their own women, and they simply refused to send woman into combat. You need to hurry up and realize who the good guys were in WWII.


736db3  No.675316

>>675307

>>ww2: total war

><might as well send the women to the front line

Yo, but there is NO FUCKING NEED to do that.

The germans were on the last legs, and what did they use instead? Boys and old men, and they still functional as well as normal adult men against both the americans and the Soviet.

Meanwhile, on the Soviet side, the women were employed IN LESSER NUMBER and have LESSER PERFORMANCE than men.

Thus, the only logical reason why the Soviet used womyn at all is because of propaganda purpose i.e. muh feminism, which is similiar to how the kikes did later on with the Israel Defense Force and Rojava/now Syrian Defense Force.

Womyn were muh images.


736db3  No.675317

>>675316

And no,

saying:

><might as well send the women to the front line

is different THAN saying:

>women snipers were more focused in training and easier to train,

The second implies there's a direct boon to training womyn.

Fucking pig-sluts.


16c469  No.676268

>>674955

Behold, the eternal anglo in flesh, how vile is it, how repugnant, truly the defeat of the Germanics in that war was the most suitable of karmic punishments levied upon the british empire and the british race or whatever genetic slag there is still left of it.

I could never grasp anglo's of this type in these places, they dance gleefully on the corpses of their own forefathers in the dungheap they have inherited, spitefully mocking any and all who saw to prevent it.

>inbefore not actually british

>inbefore jewish

>inbefore communist


d7caa3  No.676271

>>676268

This kind of angloposting is similar to shitskins calling Europeans "cumskin".

Neutered, sterile insult.


93af2d  No.676284

>>676268

>truly the defeat of the Germanics in that war

But we won though?


eced1a  No.676286

File: 9353f758c290d64⋯.png (496.21 KB, 696x748, 174:187, 1555737474-1.png)

File: 798b31ecb88abca⋯.jpg (115.38 KB, 704x916, 176:229, Brit_subhuman_laughing_at_….jpg)

File: d0ab9c303c2f4d9⋯.png (356.61 KB, 800x2048, 25:64, Eternal angloism.png)

File: eff40a52b9b44d0⋯.png (365.73 KB, 584x916, 146:229, Britain yes 21.png)

File: ec9ee0acdf6882b⋯.png (485.76 KB, 1018x656, 509:328, drowning_in_islam.png)

>>676284

Yeah, you really "won" the war. Doesn't victory taste ever so sweet?


7cb4fe  No.676287

>>676284

>that flag

>that post

So you're not Anglo


93af2d  No.676288

File: ec3d40b245fef5d⋯.png (571.69 KB, 704x527, 704:527, ClipboardImage.png)

>>676286

>>676287

t. 75% face


abcaeb  No.676294

>>676288

That's definetly a solace when you hear the moaning of all the raped british girls being pimped out by Paki rape gangs, hm?


ad7cc5  No.676304

File: 076c7e9e4c9a250⋯.png (56.71 KB, 216x196, 54:49, 1559158671.png)

File: 26eb73ed5e172a0⋯.png (103.35 KB, 445x365, 89:73, __kanna_kamui_kobayashi_an….png)

File: 53b0984c7d66e4a⋯.jpg (54.09 KB, 1266x675, 422:225, I_don't_know.JPG)

File: ab75265cdfb8f78⋯.jpg (17.59 KB, 309x288, 103:96, puzzled_lupino.JPG)

File: fc33fc15df6f76a⋯.jpg (85.47 KB, 750x501, 250:167, walus.jpg)

>>675015

> preparing to invade the Europe no matter what

They tried in 1918 already, but got BTFO by Poland for two decades.

>>675211

>I know it may be hard to understand for a pole, but civilised nations have a notion of comradery and helping your allies out in a time of need

Think, for as long as your mental capacity allows you to about what you just wrote.

>>676288

>Beyond any reasonable doubt and by all metrics win a war, any war

>Somehow you're even worse off than the country you so heroically defeated.


a7fe8d  No.676309

File: 2c6908a32e161be⋯.png (8.14 KB, 708x85, 708:85, britian.png)


ad7cc5  No.676318

>>676309

He even acknowledges it but tries to barter with the German (internationally recognized as the loser of WWII) who has it worse.


8898b8  No.676320

>>675306

>If it was easier to train women, why didn't Germans train them and make them join Volkssturm?

Because Germany had trouble equipping the Volkssturm already.

If they had done it in 1941 it might have work (but there was no reason to) by the time they were desperate enough to do it there was no point.


855d98  No.676330

>>676320

Certainly a lesson for next time.

Full war economy until the threat is gone.


6b5a6a  No.676341

File: 584f9369b4a7a09⋯.webm (9.58 MB, 480x360, 4:3, typical kraut.webm)

>anon makes thread on the potential effectiveness of women in select combat roles

>>676287

>>676294

>>676271

>>675236

>>675019

>krauts shit it up

I there anything you chubby drunken buffoons won't ruin? Using both bombs on Japan was a mistake.


7413bb  No.676343

>>675211

>I know it may be hard to understand for a pole, but civilised nations have a notion of comradery and helping your allies out in a time of need.

Did you forget what country you're from.


efdf6a  No.676344

>>676341

>potential effectiveness

There is none.

>>676320

Yo, so instead of equipping children and old men, they should equip women instead?

Is that what you are saying?


6c0d30  No.676401

File: 874bf1a7cb0941d⋯.jpg (27.86 KB, 475x475, 1:1, guinea pig.jpg)

>>676341

Anon I am going to teach you something you should have learned in childhood, but you didn't because of your liberal cultural marxist upbringing.

See this little fucker? This little guy is a guinea pig, one of the best pets a kid can have.

One of the first things anyone who keeps guinea pigs has to learn, is that its ok to have a group of only male guinea pigs or a group of only female guinea pigs, but never a mixed group.

The reason for that is not that if you mix them they will create offspring, its totally possible to castrate/sterilize guinea pigs, but the moment you introduce even one member of the opposite sex into a male or female population, they will murder the shit out of each others in the attempt of establishing a hierarchy of who gets to fuck with the opposite sex.

Humans are a lot like guinea pigs in that aspect, which you will see if you ever had the chance to compare groups of only males or females and then compare them to groups that have members of both sexes. Most people are unaware of this instinct and act it out subconsciously, but even if they are aware of it, its doubtful they would be able to change their behavior because it would need a level discipline that isn't taught anymore to kids since the 1960s.

Humanity as a whole has known about this effect for millennia, which is part of the reason of why almost every culture in history separated its social live and work into male and female spheres and kept the mixing of the sexes on the family level, where it couldn't affect the functioning of society.

With that in mind, now think about how effective an army can be, which allows women to mix with males on a unit level. It will be utterly garbage, because the grunts will be too busy haggling social favoritism instead of doing their duty.


23eeed  No.676407

>>676341

>potential effectiveness of women in select combat roles

Even if that was actually a thing, putting them in the frontlines is a net-loss since they could be used to breed multiple soldiers of superior genes instead of a single soldier with at best slightly above mediocre performance with same set of genes.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / ausneets / b2 / choroy / dempart / freeb / vichan ]